Outcomes in orthopedic device infections due to Streptococcus agalactiae: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Group B streptococci (Streptococcus agalactiae) (GBS) is a rare cause of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) occurring in patients with comorbidities and seems to be associated with a poor outcome. Depiction of GBS PJI is scarce in the literature. METHODS: A retrospective survey in 2 referral centers for bone joint infections was done Patients with a history of PJI associated with GBS between 2014 and 2019 were included. A descriptive analysis of treatment failure was done. Risk factors of treatment failure were assessed. RESULTS: We included 61 patients. Among them, 41 had monomicrobial (67%) infections. The median duration of follow-up was 2 years (interquartile range 2.35) Hypertension, obesity, and diabetes mellitus were the most reported comorbidities (49%, 50%, and 36% respectively). Death was observed in 6 individuals (10%) during the initial management. The rate of success was 63% (26/41). Removal of the material was not associated with remission (p = 0.5). We did not find a specific antibiotic regimen associated with a better outcome. CONCLUSION: The results show that S. agalactiae PJIs are associated with high rates of comorbidities and a high treatment failure rate with no optimal treatment so far.

Conservative surgical treatment for metatarsal osteomyelitis in diabetic foot: experience of two French centres.

AIMS: Conservative surgery (CS) for diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) consists in removing all or part of the infected bone tissues without amputation, in complement with antibiotic therapy. Data on CS for DFO therapy are scarce. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all DFO episodes treated with CS between 06/2007 and 12/2017. Remission was defined by the absence of soft-tissue infection, complete sustained (i.e. > 1 month) healing of the foot ulcer, favourable (i.e., stabilisation or improvement) radiological outcome, and no need for additional surgery during a 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: During the study period, 47 episodes (in 41 patients) were analysed. Excluding deaths (all unrelated to the DFO; n = 3) or loss to follow-up before 1 year (n = 5), the remission rate was 64.2%. Most failures occurred during the first 6 months (79%, 11/14). Patients who experienced failure had a higher rate of peripheral arterial disease with arterial stenosis than patients in remission (57% vs. 24%, P = 0.03), a higher C-reactive protein rate at admission (116 ± 112 mg/L vs. 48 ± 46 mg/L, P = 0.02), and a trend for a higher rate of abscesses (29% vs. 4%, P = 0.06). At 1-year follow-up, foot ulcers related to transfer lesion were identified in 25.5% of the cases. At the last follow-up (mean 3 ± 2 years), the remission rate was 23/25 (92%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that CS is a therapeutic option in patients with localised but severe DFO. Clinicians should, however, consider the necessity of revascularisation, and higher risk of failure if surgery is performed in patients presenting with acute foot infections.

Fully oral targeted antibiotic therapy for Gram-positive cocci-related periprosthetic joint infections: a real-life before and after study.

BACKGROUND: The optimal length of the intravenous antibiotic treatment of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) generally ranges from one to six weeks and is a matter of debate. Most antibiotics active against Gram-positive cocci (GPC) exhibit both high oral bioavailability and bone diffusion. Thus, early oral therapy may be a reasonable option in GPC-related PJIs. METHODS: A 2 year before and after monocentric study that aimed to compare two antibiotic strategies. Empirical intravenous postoperative antibiotic treatment was followed by 7 to 10 days of intravenous targeted therapy ('before' group) or by full orally targeted antibiotic treatment ('after' group). The primary outcome was a treatment failure during follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 93 patients were analysed, 43 and 50 in the before and the after groups, respectively. Both groups were comparable in terms of surgical procedures, comorbidities, microbiological documentation and infection site. Antibiotics prescribed to our patients had high oral bioavailability and bone diffusion with rifampicin/fluoroquinolone combinations being the most frequent antibiotic regimens. Both hospital stay and intravenous antibiotic treatment mean durations were shorter in the before group than in the after group [15.0 versus 11.0 days; (P < 0.01) and 13.0 versus 7.0 days; P < 0.001, respectively]. The remission rate assessed after at least a year of follow-up was comparable in the before and the after groups (hazard ratio = 0.70; 95% CI 0.30-1.58). CONCLUSIONS: Full oral targeted antibiotic therapy using a drug regimen with high oral bioavailability and good bone diffusion is an option for the treatment of patients with GPC-related PJIs.

Knee arthrodesis using a custom modular intramedullary nail in failed, infected knee arthroplasties: A concise follow-up note of 31 cases at a median of 13 years post-arthrodesis.

INTRODUCTION: Knee arthrodesis utilizes an arthrodesis nail as a salvage technique for infected total knee arthroplasty (TKA), especially when the extensor mechanism is damaged, or the skin is compromised. This implant helps to minimize or prevent leg length discrepancy, while allowing immediate weight bearing without requiring bone fusion. However, there is a risk of infection. Surgical revisions were required in 19% of patients at 50 months' follow-up in our team's initial 31-patient case series. Since there is little long-term outcome data, we reviewed this same group of patients after a mean of 13 years to determine: (1) the implant's long-term survival, (2) the functional outcomes, (3) the microbiological changes in revision cases. HYPOTHESIS: The long-term survival of knee arthrodesis using an arthrodesis nail for failed infected TKA is acceptable. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients operated on between January 2005 and December 2008 were retrospectively included in the initial study. The functional outcomes consisted of pain on a visual analog scale (VAS), neuropathic pain (DN4) and the Oxford Knee Score. All surgical revisions were documented with repeat microbiology samples. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 13.1 years [11.5-13.5]. No mechanical failure (implant failure or aseptic loosening) was observed. Eight patients were re-operated on due to new infections. The nail had to be removed in five of these patients. None of the patients required an amputation. Among the eight patients who were re-operated on, only two (25%) had been re-operated on since the initial study and underwent a two-stage arthrodesis revision. At 10 years, the cumulative incidence of surgical revision at the knee was 26% [95% CI: 12%-43%] and 16% [95% CI: 5.7%-31%] for an implant change. Six (75%) of the re-operated patients had their revision within the first 72 months of the initial TKA, while 4 (50%) had it within the first 26 months. Among the 15 patients who were still alive, the median Oxford Knee Score was 17/48 [12-28]. At the final assessment, the median pain level was 0 [0-5], although 4 of the 10 analyzable patients (of the 15 living patients, 3 had a cognitive impairment and 2 refused to participate) had neuropathic pain and pain on VAS of 3/10. The microbiologic findings were the same during the surgical revision in five of the eight re-operated patients (62%); however, one patient who had a Staphylococcus aureus infection had acquired a resistance to methicillin. In one patient, only one of the two bacteria identified initially was still present (methicillin-susceptible Coagulase-negative staphylococci [CNS]) and while in two patients, the infectious agent changed completely (shift from Gram-negative bacilli to methicillin-susceptible CNS, and the opposite for the other patient). DISCUSSION: Knee arthrodesis with a custom modular intramedullary nail is a viable limb salvage option in failed infected TKA cases with long-term survival, and it is comparable to other arthrodesis techniques. In most cases, recurrence of the infection occurred in the short term (<72 months). Later recurrences of the infection (>72 months) were rarer and were found in only two of our patients (6%). There were no mechanical failures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; Retrospective cohort study.

Tolerance of Prolonged Oral Tedizolid for Prosthetic Joint Infections: Results of a Multicentre Prospective Study.

OBJECTIVES: Data on clinical and biological tolerance of tedizolid (TZD) prolonged therapy are lacking. METHODS: We conducted a prospective multicentre study including patients with prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) who were treated for at least 6 weeks but not more than 12 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty-three adult patients of mean age 73.3 ± 10.5 years, with PJI including hip (n = 19), knee (n = 13) and shoulder (n = 1) were included. All patients were operated, with retention of the infected implants and one/two stage-replacements in 11 (33.3%) and 17/5 (51.5%/15.2%), respectively. Staphylococci and enterococci were the most prevalent bacteria identified. The mean duration of TZD therapy was 8.0 ± 3.27 weeks (6-12). TZD was associated with another antibiotic in 18 patients (54.5%), including rifampicin in 16 cases (48.5). Six patients (18.2%) had to stop TZD therapy prematurely because of intolerance which was potentially attributable to TZD (n = 2), early failure of PJI treatment (n = 2) or severe anaemia due to bleeding (n = 2). Regarding compliance with TZD therapy, no cases of two or more omissions of medication intake were recorded during the whole TZD treatment duration. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest good compliance and a favourable safety profile of TZD, providing evidence of the potential benefit of the use of this agent for the antibiotic treatment of PJIs.

Bilateral One-Stage Revision of Infected Total Hip Arthroplasties: Report of Two Cases and Management of Antibiotic Therapy.

Recommendations for the management of chronic and bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) infection are lacking. However, this type of infection involves medical problems concerning the management of the antibiotic therapy. We report two cases of such infections operated as one-stage revision. For each case, both hips were infected with the same bacteria (Staphylococcus caprae for one patient and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus for the other). The probabilistic antibiotic treatment started during the first side (after harvesting intraoperative samples) did not prevent the culture of the bacteriologic harvested during the intervention of the second side. Cultures were positive for the same bacteria for both sides in the two cases presented herein. After results of intraoperative cultures, patients received culture-guided antibiotic therapy for three months and were considered cured at the end of a two-year follow-up. Our results suggest one-stage bilateral change of infected THA is a viable option and that early intraoperative antibiotic, started during the first-side exchange, does not jeopardize microbiological documentation of the second side. This work brings indirect arguments, in favor of the use of prophylactic antibiotics during revision of infected THA.

Six-week versus twelve-week antibiotic therapy for nonsurgically treated diabetic foot osteomyelitis: a multicenter open-label controlled randomized study.

OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the optimal duration of antibiotic therapy for diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO). This study sought to compare the effectiveness of 6 versus 12 weeks of antibiotic therapy in patients with DFO treated nonsurgically (i.e., antibiotics alone). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a prospective randomized trial comparing 6- versus 12-week duration of antibiotic treatment. Remission of osteomyelitis during the monitoring period was defined as complete and persistent (>4 weeks) healing of the wound (if present initially), absence of recurrent infection at the initial site or that of adjacent rays, and no need for surgical bone resection or amputation at the end of a follow-up period of at least 12 months after completion of antibiotic treatment. RESULTS: Forty patients followed at five French general hospitals were randomized between January 2007 and January 2009, with 20 treated for 6 weeks and 20 treated for 12 weeks with antibiotics. The two groups were comparable for all variables recorded at inclusion in the study. Remission was obtained in 26 (65%) patients, with no significant differences between patients treated for 6 versus 12 weeks (12/20 vs. 14/20, respectively; P = 0.50). We did not identify any significant parameters associated with patient outcome. Fewer patients treated for 6 weeks experienced gastrointestinal adverse events related to antimicrobial therapy compared with patients treated for 12 weeks (respectively, 15 vs. 45%; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The present multicenter prospective randomized study provides data suggesting that 6-week duration of antibiotic therapy may be sufficient in patients with DFO for whom nonsurgical treatment is considered.

Outcome and predictors of treatment failure in total hip/knee prosthetic joint infections due to Staphylococcus aureus.

BACKGROUND: Variables associated with the outcome of patients treated for prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) due to Staphylococcus aureus are not well known. METHODS: The medical records of patients treated surgically for total hip or knee prosthesis infection due to S. aureus were reviewed. Remission was defined by the absence of local or systemic signs of implant-related infection assessed during the most recent contact with the patient. RESULTS: After a mean posttreatment follow-up period of 43.6 ± 32.1 months, 77 (78.6%) of 98 patients were in remission. Retention of the infected implants was not associated with a worse outcome than was their removal. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA)-related PJIs were not associated with worse outcome, compared with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA)-related PJIs. Pathogens identified during revision for failure exhibited no acquired resistance to antibiotics used as definitive therapy, in particular rifampin. In univariate analysis, parameters that differed between patients whose treatment did or did not fail were: American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, prescription of adequate empirical postsurgical antibiotic therapy, and use of rifampin combination therapy upon discharge from hospital. In multivariate analysis, ASA score ≤2 (odds ratio [OR], 6.87 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.45-32.45]; P = .04) and rifampin-fluoroquinolone combination therapy (OR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.17-0.97]; P = .01) were 2 independent variables associated with remission. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study suggest that the ASA score significantly affects the outcome of patients treated for total hip and knee prosthetic infections due to MSSA or MRSA and that rifampin combination therapy is associated with a better outcome for these patients when compared with other antibiotic regimens.

Tolerability of prolonged linezolid therapy in bone and joint infection: protective effect of rifampicin on the occurrence of anaemia?

BACKGROUND: Linezolid therapy has shown high rates of clinical success in patients with osteomyelitis and prosthetic joint infections caused by Gram-positive cocci. Recent studies have demonstrated that linezolid/rifampicin combination therapy prevents the emergence of rifampicin-resistant mutations in vitro. However, linezolid/rifampicin combination-related haematological and neurological toxicities have not been evaluated. OBJECTIVES: To assess the tolerability of prolonged linezolid/rifampicin combination therapy compared with other linezolid-containing regimens in patients with bone and joint infections. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 94 patients who had received linezolid for >4 weeks after bone and joint infections. Anaemia was defined as a ≥2 g/dL reduction in haemoglobin, leucopenia as a total leucocyte count <4 × 10(9)/L, and thrombocytopenia as a reduction in platelet count to <75% of baseline. RESULTS: Anaemia was less frequent among patients on linezolid/rifampicin combination therapy than among patients on linezolid alone or in combination with other drugs (9.3%, 44% and 52%, respectively; P<0.01). In multivariate analysis, age and treatment group were independently associated with anaemia. Thrombocytopenia was reported in 44% of patients on linezolid/rifampicin combination therapy, in 48% of patients on linezolid alone and in 57.7% of patients on other linezolid-containing regimens. Age was the only variable associated with thrombocytopenia (P=0.019) in univariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Linezolid/rifampicin combination therapy was associated with a significantly reduced incidence of anaemia among patients with bone and joint infections, but it did not have an effect on thrombocytopenia and peripheral neuropathy rates. Linezolid/rifampicin combination therapy was not associated with poor clinical outcomes.

Needle puncture and transcutaneous bone biopsy cultures are inconsistent in patients with diabetes and suspected osteomyelitis of the foot.

BACKGROUND: Needle puncture has been suggested as a method for identifying bacteria in the bones in patients with diabetes with osteomyelitis of the foot. However, no studies have compared needle puncture with concomitant transcutaneous bone biopsy, which is the current standard recommended in international guidelines. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in 2 French diabetes foot clinics. Transcutaneous bone biopsy specimens, needle puncture specimens, and swab samples were collected on the same day for each patient. RESULTS: Overall, 31 patients were included in the study from July 2006 through February 2008. Twenty-one bone biopsy specimens (67.7%), 18 needle puncture specimens (58%), and 30 swab samples (96.7%) had positive culture results. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common type of bacteria that grew from bone samples, followed by Proteus mirabilis and Morganella morganii. The mean number of bacteria types per positive sample were 1.35, 1.32, and 2.51 for bone biopsy specimens, needle puncture specimens, and swab samples, respectively. Among the 20 patients with positive bone biopsy specimens (69%), 13 had positive needle puncture samples. Overall, the correlation between microbiological results was 23.9%, with S. aureus showing the strongest correlation (46.7%). Results of cultures of bone biopsy and needle puncture specimens were identical for 10 (32.3%) of 31 patients. Bone bacteria were isolated from the needle punctures in 7 (33.3%) of the 21 patients who had positive bone biopsy specimen culture results. If the results of cultures of needle puncture specimens alone had been considered, 5 patients (16.1%) would have received unnecessary treatment, and 8 patients (38.1%) who had positive bone culture results would not have been treated at all. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that needle punctures, compared with transcutaneous bone biopsies, do not identify bone bacteria reliably in patients with diabetes who have low-grade infection of the foot and suspected osteomyelitis.

First case of intrafamily transmission of a new MRSA clone with toxic shock syndrome toxin-1.

We report the first case of intrafamily transmission of a C-MRSA clone harbouring toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 (TSST-1). Because of the risk of this clone to spread in the community, family members of these patients should be screened to detect and prevent the diffusion of recurrent or new infections.

Outcome of diabetic foot osteomyelitis treated nonsurgically: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article was to identify criteria predictive of remission in nonsurgical treatment of diabetic foot osteomyelitis. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Diabetic patients who were initially treated without orthopedic surgery for osteomyelitis of the toe or metatarsal head of a nonischemic foot between June 2002 and June 2003 in nine French diabetic foot centers were identified, and their medical records were reviewed. Remission was defined as the absence of any sign of infection at the initial or contiguous site assessed at least 1 year after the end of treatment. A total of 24 demographic, clinical, and therapeutic variables including bone versus swab culture-based antibiotic therapy were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty consecutive patients aged 62.2 +/- 11.1 years (mean +/- SD) with diabetes duration of 16 +/- 10.9 years were included. The mean duration of antibiotic treatment was 11.5 +/- 4.21 weeks. Bone biopsy was routinely available in four of the nine centers. Overall patient management was similar in the different centers except for the use of rifampin, which was recorded more frequently in patients from centers in which a bone biopsy was available. At the end of a 12.8-month posttreatment mean follow-up, 32 patients (64%) were in remission. Bone culture-based antibiotic therapy was the only variable associated with remission, as determined by both univariate (18 of 32 [56.3%] vs. 4 of 18 [22.2%], P = 0.02) and multivariate analyses (odds ratio 4.78 [95% CI 1.0-22.7], P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Bone culture-based antibiotic therapy is a factor predictive of success in diabetic patients treated nonsurgically for osteomyelitis of the foot.

Effectiveness and tolerability of prolonged linezolid treatment for chronic osteomyelitis: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Linezolid is an oxazolidinone agent which is apparently well designed for treating chronic osteomyelitis, but data on effectiveness and tolerability as prolonged therapy is currently lacking. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of linezolid in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis. METHODS: The charts of hospitalized patients who had been treated with linezolid for >4 weeks because of chronic osteomyelitis and were followed up for > or =12 months after the end of treatment were retrospectively reviewed for clinical outcome and tolerability. Cure was defined as the absence of clinical, biological, or radiological evidence of infection throughout the posttreatment follow-up. Linezolid tolerability was assessed on the basis of hematologic properties during treatment. RESULTS: Of the 66 patients included, all were white (mean [SD] age, 67.7 [18.1] years; 41 men and 25 women; mean [SD] weight, 80.7 [18.6] kg). Thirty-seven (56.1%) patients had infection due to implants including 27 prosthetic joints. Pathogens were predominantly methicillin-resistant staphylococci (49/72 strains, 68.1 %). Every patient was administered N linezolid (600 mg BID) treatment for 6 to 8 days as inpatients, and then, as outpatients, they were switched to PO treatment. Fifty (75.8%) patients received a combination of linezolid and other antimicrobial agents, including rifampin (32 [48.5%]). Surgery was performed in 52 (78.8%) patients. The median hospital stay was 14 days (mean [SD], 19 [11.4] days [range, 7-70 days] ). The median duration of treatment was 13 weeks (mean [SD], 14.3 [8.2] weeks [range, 5-36 weeks]). At the end of treatment, 56 (84.8%) patients were cured, and during the post-treatment follow-up (median duration, 15 months [range, 12-36 months]), 4 relapses occurred, resulting in an overall successful cure for 52 (78.8%) patients. Reversible anemia was reported in 21 patients (31.8%), of whom 16 (24.2%) required blood transfusions. Median time from treatment initiation to anemia onset was 7.3 weeks (range, 4-12 weeks). Peripheral neuropathy was reported in 6 (9.1%) patients, of whom 4 remained symptomatic for up to 24 months after linezolid discontinuation. Other reported adverse events included nausea (6 [9.1%]), diarrhea (1 [1.5%]), and headache (2 [3.0%]), although none of these patients discontinued treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective chart review, treatment with linezolid as monotherapy or in combination with antimicrobials and/or surgery was associated with cure of chronic osteomyelitis in 84.8% of subjects at 12 weeks after the end of treatment and 78.8% at follow-up. Adverse events were reported in 51.5% of subjects, and 34.8% of subjects discontinued the study because of adverse events. The potential for severe complications justifies close monitoring of these patients.

Culture of percutaneous bone biopsy specimens for diagnosis of diabetic foot osteomyelitis: concordance with ulcer swab cultures.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the diagnostic value of swab cultures by comparing them with corresponding cultures of percutaneous bone biopsy specimens for patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis. METHODS: The medical charts of patients with foot osteomyelitis who underwent a surgical percutaneous bone biopsy between January 1996 and June 2004 in a single diabetic foot clinic were reviewed. Seventy-six patients with 81 episodes of foot osteomyelitis who had positive results of culture of bone biopsy specimens and who had received no antibiotic therapy for at least 4 weeks before biopsy constituted the study population. RESULTS: Pathogens isolated from bone samples were predominantly staphylococci (52%) and gram-negative bacilli (18.4%). The distributions of microorganisms in bone and swab cultures were similar, except for coagulase-negative staphylococci, which were more prevalent in bone samples (P < .001). The results for cultures of concomitant foot ulcer swabs were available for 69 of 76 patients. The results of bone and swab cultures were identical for 12 (17.4%) of 69 patients, and bone bacteria were isolated from the corresponding swab culture in 21 (30.4%) of 69 patients. The concordance between the results of cultures of swab and of bone biopsy specimens was 42.8% for Staphylococcus aureus, 28.5% for gram-negative bacilli, and 25.8% for streptococci. The overall concordance for all isolates was 22.5%. No adverse events--such as worsening peripheral vascular disease, fracture, or biopsy-induced bone infection--were observed, but 1 patient experienced an episode of acute Charcot osteoarthropathy 4 weeks after bone biopsy was performed. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that superficial swab cultures do not reliably identify bone bacteria. Percutaneous bone biopsy seems to be safe for patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis.

Risk factors for anaemia in patients on prolonged linezolid therapy for chronic osteomyelitis: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVES: The intrinsic properties of the new antibiotic linezolid make it an attractive candidate for the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis. However, data regarding the tolerance of long-term linezolid administration are still lacking. METHODS: The medical charts of patients given linezolid for >4 weeks were retrospectively analysed, especially their haematology. In a case-control study, we compared the respective characteristics of patients who developed anaemia during linezolid therapy and those who did not. RESULTS: Forty-five adults with chronic osteomyelitis received 600 mg linezolid intravenously twice daily for 7 days, and then orally, for a mean total duration of 15.9 weeks (range, 6-36). Anaemia episodes requiring blood transfusion occurred in 13/45 patients (28.9%). Median time from treatment initiation to anaemia onset was 7.4 weeks (range, 4-16). Anaemia was significantly associated with premature linezolid therapy cessation (P = 0.0012). No linezolid-related thrombocytopenia was observed. By univariate analysis, four variables were associated with the occurrence of anaemia: age >58 years, alcohol abuse, diabetes mellitus and low haemoglobin before linezolid treatment. Logistic regression analysis revealed two independent risk factors for anaemia: age >58 years (OR = 20.5, 95% CI 0.69-599; P = 0.0001) and pre-treatment haemoglobin <10.5 g/dL (OR = 16.49, 95% CI 1.06-255; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Profound anaemia may occur in adult patients with chronic osteomyelitis on prolonged linezolid therapy, and often necessitates linezolid cessation. These patients are likely to be aged >58 years and to have low pre-treatment haemoglobin. The results for the present series might help physicians to identify patients who should not be given long-term linezolid treatment for chronic osteomyelitis.